Relationship between the Commission's 2019-20 Portfolio Budget Statements and the Corporate Plan 2019-20
Figure 3: Corporate Plan mapped to Portfolio Budget Statements
Differences in the 2019-20 Corporate Plan and 2019-20 Portfolio Budget Statements
The performance measures set out in the 2019-20 Corporate Plan were different to the performance criteria shown in the Portfolio Budget Statement (PBS) in that the Corporate Plan contained more performance measures than the PBS. The performance criteria from the PBS and performance measures from the Corporate Plan are shown in Table 1.
Strategic Priorities 2019-20 |
2019-20 Corporate Plan Performance Measures |
2019-20 PBS Performance Criteria |
---|---|---|
Ensuring Good Governance |
Transform the APS Employment Framework |
Modernise the APS Workforce |
Shape the APS |
Shape the APS Workforce |
|
Lifting the Capability of the APS |
Build Workforce Capability in the APS |
Build Workforce Capability |
Building Leadership for the Future |
Strengthen Leadership in the APS |
|
Providing Stewardship of the APS |
Provide the Voice of the APS |
|
Upholding the Integrity of the APS |
Promote a High Standard of Integrity in the APS |
Promote a High Standard of Integrity in the APS |
Providing the Right Tools and Workplace for our Staff |
Be an Employer of Choice in a Competitive Workplace |
The difference between the PBS performance criteria and performance measures is due to timing and further maturing and clarification of priorities. The PBS was released prior to the development of the Corporate Plan. Upon reflection, additional performance measures were added in the 2019-20 Corporate Plan to ensure the Commission would fulfil its role and purpose.
PBS Program 1.2, does not map to the Corporate Plan as a decision was taken not to include the work of Remuneration Tribunal in the Corporate Plan. However, performance has been evaluated for this PBS program in the PBS program performance section.
The Commission's Annual Performance Statements
In the 2019-20 Corporate Plan, we identified six strategic priorities to guide our activities. The performance measures under each strategic priority were developed to ensure the Commission remained focussed on its purpose. All performance measures were evaluated as either Achieved, Partially Achieved or Not Achieved.
Overall Performance of the Commission
In the face of workforce and workplace upheaval, the Australian Public Service Commission has ensured the continued delivery of what the Government, the Australian Public Service, and the Australian people expect of us. In addition, the Commission has also been at the forefront of efforts to support the APS response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
While not all strategic priorities were completely achieved in the original timeframes, the Commission has fully and / or partially achieved over 80% of the planned outcomes; in addition to redirecting our effort to the right areas at the right time to address the unexpected demands experienced in the second half of the financial year.
This is reflected in the performance summary below.
Performance Summary
2019-20 Corporate Plan |
Number of Targets |
Achieved |
Partially Achieved |
Not Achieved |
---|---|---|---|---|
1: Ensuring Good Governance |
5 |
1 |
4 |
- |
2: Lifting the Capability of the APS |
7 |
5 |
- |
2 |
3: Building leadership for the future |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
4: Stewardship of the APS |
5 |
3 |
2 |
- |
5: Upholding the integrity of the APS |
2 |
1 |
1 |
- |
6: Providing the right tools and workplace for our staff |
4 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
Total |
25 |
13 |
8 |
4 |